Fernando, FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS (2020) How many manuscripts should I peer review per year. Universidade de Lisboa. Lisbon (Portugal). pp. 1-6. ISSN 1886-3655
![[img]](http://eprints.umsb.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Pharmacy Practice 2020 (1).pdf Download (12MB) |
Abstract
Abstract: Peer review provides the foundation for the scholarly publishing system. The conventional peer review system consists of using authors of articles as reviewers for other colleagues’ manuscripts in a collaborative-basis system. However, authors complain about a theoretical overwhelming number of invitations to peer review. It seems that authors feel that they are invited to review many more manuscripts than they should when taking into account their participation in the scholarly publishing system. The high number of scientific journals and the existence of predatory journals were reported as potential causes of this excessive number of reviews required. In this editorial, we demonstrate that the number of reviewers required to publish a given number of articles depends exclusively on the journals’ rejection rate and the number of reviewers intended per manuscript. Several initiatives to overcome the peer review crises are suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RS Pharmacy and materia medica |
| Divisions: | Library of Congress Subject Areas > P Language and Literature > Farmasi Library of Congress Subject Areas > P Language and Literature > Fakultas Farmasi > Farmasi Fakultas Farmasi > Farmasi |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email repo@umsb.ac.id |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2022 06:30 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2022 06:30 |
| URI: | http://eprints.umsb.ac.id/id/eprint/443 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
