Fernando, FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS (2019) Peer review and publication delay. Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa. pp. 1-3. ISSN 1886-3655
![[img]](http://eprints.umsb.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Pharmacy Practice 2019 (1).pdf Download (12MB) |
Abstract
Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of scholarly publications. An alternative to selecting peer reviewers from data bases created with expressions of interest of volunteers consists in systematically searching PubMed for similar articles and inviting their authors to act as peer reviewers. Although this process might identify more appropriate peers, it also can increase the time of the editorial process. In 2018, Pharmacy Practice had to invite 4.70 (SE=0.33) potential reviewers per one accepting. The time from the first reviewer invitation to the last reviewer report received was 61 days (SE=2.1). These figures confirm the existence of a peer review crisis which is significantly increasing the publication delay.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RS Pharmacy and materia medica |
| Divisions: | Library of Congress Subject Areas > P Language and Literature > Farmasi Library of Congress Subject Areas > P Language and Literature > Fakultas Farmasi > Farmasi Fakultas Farmasi > Farmasi |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email repo@umsb.ac.id |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2022 06:38 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2022 06:38 |
| URI: | http://eprints.umsb.ac.id/id/eprint/445 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
