Fernando, FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS (2018) Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers. Universidade de Lisboa. Lisbon (Portugal). pp. 1-4. ISSN 1886-3655
![[img]](http://eprints.umsb.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Pharmacy Practice 2018 (1).pdf Download (6MB) |
Abstract
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating prepublication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RS Pharmacy and materia medica |
| Divisions: | Library of Congress Subject Areas > P Language and Literature > Farmasi Library of Congress Subject Areas > P Language and Literature > Fakultas Farmasi > Farmasi Fakultas Farmasi > Farmasi |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email repo@umsb.ac.id |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2022 07:01 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2022 07:01 |
| URI: | http://eprints.umsb.ac.id/id/eprint/450 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
